This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| commissies:sovcom:start [2026/02/13 11:52] – [Local compute cloud] haaijer | commissies:sovcom:start [2026/03/19 13:36] (current) – [Local office suite] haaijer | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
| It would be nice to offer an office suite to associations that is not google or microsoft, and perhaps roll that out to the full UT. | It would be nice to offer an office suite to associations that is not google or microsoft, and perhaps roll that out to the full UT. | ||
| - | All using Kubernetes: | + | Some popular options: |
| + | * Nextcloud | ||
| + | * Mostly for file management, but rich plugin support | ||
| + | * UT (Henri) is working on this through SURF. | ||
| + | * Federated auth (so external uni employees can collaborate) | ||
| + | * UT plans support for UT 053 phone numbers | ||
| + | * quite well integrated | ||
| + | * Plugin system means that some development is a bit harder, but its viable | ||
| * Opendesk | * Opendesk | ||
| * Most complete. | * Most complete. | ||
| Line 77: | Line 84: | ||
| * Combination of LaSuite and Opendesk components | * Combination of LaSuite and Opendesk components | ||
| * Looks quite promising | * Looks quite promising | ||
| - | * Deployment as of writing only supports openshift. K8S support is broken | + | * Still very much work in progress, |
| ===== Local LLM ===== | ===== Local LLM ===== | ||