Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- commissies:sovcom:start [2026/02/07 11:43] – [Local LLM] haaijer
+++ commissies:sovcom:start [2026/03/19 13:36] (current) – [Local office suite] haaijer
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
     * Missing some nice to haves such as reinstalls, cloudinit scripts
   * Cloudstack
-    * Less popular but seems to be growing
+    * Maintained but not extremely active
+    * Becoming more popular now
     * More cloud-based, so end users can make their own VMs on demand
-    * We need to look into this more.
+    * Requires Alma/Rocky
+    * A bit overkill for SNT, but great for organisations that want more features and a better UI compared to proxmox
   * Openstack
     * By far the most features
@@ Line 60: / Line 62: @@
 It would be nice to offer an office suite to associations that is not google or microsoft, and perhaps roll that out to the full UT.
-All using Kubernetes:
+Some popular options:
+  * Nextcloud
+    * Mostly for file management, but rich plugin support
+    * UT (Henri) is working on this through SURF.
+      * Federated auth (so external uni employees can collaborate)
+      * UT plans support for UT 053 phone numbers
+    * quite well integrated
+    * Plugin system means that some development is a bit harder, but its viable
   * Opendesk
     * Most complete.
@@ Line 75: / Line 84: @@
     * Combination of LaSuite and Opendesk components
     * Looks quite promising
-    * Deployment as of writing only supports openshift. K8S support is broken but this should be fixed soon.
+    * Still very much work in progress, but is starting to be usable due to some work by an SNT'er
 ===== Local LLM =====